Hi. Thanks for stopping by. This is a site for Movie Lovers. Some opinions, some facts, some fun. Accent on fairness, no highbrow snob action, free of p.c. If that sounds vaguely right-leaning, rest assured it most definitely is not: we just don’t much suffer b.s. While I don’t isolate in a darkened room, spilling a diet soda while talking back to the screen and can run, jump & throw a ball like other people, over six decades I’ve somehow managed to see more than 6,000 movies. I like to share my takes on the stories they tell and the people who tell them. That’s pretty much it in a nutshell, but below we’ll give you an idea of what you might notice the site includes and also what is missing.
I struggle to keep write-ups fair enough to applaud what works in films that may not be successful and nudge what may be lacking in those that are, and favor putting things in historical and thematic context, if the specific production calls for it. As to synopses, let’s keep those as brief as possible. It’s a cheat when critics use up half or more of the text of a review to go in detail over the plot. War Of The Worlds: Martians attack the Earth. Bingo! All I need to know. Now, is it good or bad, and why, why not?–that’s what I’m after. Too much detailing of the storyline is like someone giving you directions to a store that are so complicated you need a secretary and a camera to transcribe it all. Plus, I want people to read all the way to the end, and get as much info as they can without losing patience (with me) or giving away the experience of seeing the movie. Cut to the chase.
We’ll often note the ages of some of the cast members at the time the film was made, sort of placing these screen-people we feel we “know” in their own stage of development as artist or person. “Wow, Lancaster was 44 and he could still jump over that log like a teenager!”
Figures on production costs and grosses are included with the caveat that they are never 100% reliable (accounting often shifted around by studios to address other worries, punish errant producers, hide, cheat…). With demonic inflation, things get more screwy to pin down. I leave it to the reader to factor in that a million bucks in 1952 doesn’t equal the same amount today. Looking at $$ figures can also help place a film in a greater historical context as to The Market—“wow, it’s so famous, but no-one went to see it!” A little romantic comedy that cost a million-five in 1962 now swallows sixty times that. The astronomical grosses today reflect both inflated prices and a doubled population.
I welcome comments and am keen to share viewpoints and impressions, and unlike certain politicians can tolerate a thoughtful question or disagreement–but will not engage with acidic poseurs who wish to lecture me on ‘cinema’ or venomous trolls who hate the world from the safety of their keyboard. My supply of life minutes is too precious, better spent re-watching The Wind And The Lion or The Magnificent Seven for the fortieth time. Want to trade lines from It’s A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World or The Wild Bunch, compare Bernard Herrmann to Jerry Goldsmith or just plug a comedy or monster movie you like? You came to the right place.
Some of my musings you’ll agree with, others you’ll dismiss with a snort, but whichever lane you choose, do come along on memory trips to steamy jungles, raging seas, distant planets, to boudoirs and battlefields, peals of laughter and screams of fright. Rumble with Jets and Sharks, try to reach ‘The Big W’ before Ethel, see ‘the varmint’ with Linus, take Aqaba by camel and Ft. Knox by Galore. Cheers, Mark